Saturday, January 19, 2013

Destiny of the Unsaved



        There are many arguments used today to try to disprove God’s existence. One such argument is that a loving God would not send people to Hell. Clark Pinnock writes, "How can Christians possibly project a deity of such cruelty and vindictiveness whose ways include inflicting everlasting torture upon His creatures, however sinful they may have been? Surely a God who would do such a thing is more nearly like Satan than like God, at least by any ordinary moral standards, and by the gospel itself."[1]     
        To state, “at least by any ordinary moral standards, and by the gospel itself," one acknowledges a moral standard or law.[2] If there is a moral law, there must be a moral law giver. This moral lawgiver is the God of the Bible. Pinnock states that He is cruel and no better than Satan; however, for a person to form an educated opinion, they must look at the facts. The Bible does say anyone who rejects Jesus Christ in this life will spend eternity in judgment but depending on a person’s beliefs, that judgment may look very different.
        Two approaches to reconcile sinners with God’s judgment, while eliminating eternal damnation, are annihilationism and universalism. Annihilationism says the souls of the lost either become non-existent at death or eventually lapse into nothingness.[3] Universalism says all souls are eventually saved.[4] These views, while using specific verses in an attempt to gain credibility, clearly contradict the teachings of the apostle John and Jesus Himself in regards to future punishment. Interestingly, both spoke more about the love of God than any other contributors to the New Testament.[5] Eternal punishment is exactly that, eternal (Mat. 18:8; 25:41, 46; 2 Thes. 1:9). There is some dispute as to the degree and specifics of the punishment but the Scriptures clearly support this idea.
          The Bible uses different words that have similar meaning in regards to the place of punishment. Sheol, according to the Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, is an intermediate state where the soul is dealt with and Hades, “is virtually synonymous with the Hebrew Sheol.”[6] Another word found in the Scriptures is Gehenna and it is used metaphorically for hell; originally a location outside the city of Jerusalem, people would sacrifice their children to Moloch and burn their bodies there.[7] The word Hell is used in various locations throughout Scripture and has various meanings, the original meaning, “simply ‘the grave.’”[8]
        The idea of fire and brimstone conjure up images of tormented souls in a fiery, cavernous dwelling. The Biblical story of Lazarus and the rich man give a glimpse into the states of eternal life or damnation (Lk. 16:19-31). The thought of the rich man begging for a drop of water on his tongue and not wanting his brothers to perish with him is almost unbearable. Most likely, this is where many opponents to Christianity find God to be tyrannical and unjust.
        Jesus said it would be better to pluck out your own eye and live than to save it and go to hell (Mat. 5:29). That is a shocking statement but if He used such a graphic example, obviously it is worse than we can imagine. In Matthew 25:46, Jesus plainly states that we will either go to eternal punishment or eternal life. John wrote, “Anyone whose name was not found written in the book of life was thrown into the lake of fire” (Rev. 20:15, NIV).
        One argument against the existence of hell is stated, “Truth, we are told, is discovered only by science and since hell can’t be proven by the scientific method it must be rejected.”[9] Another argument against hell and eternal damnation is the doctrine of apokatastasis. It uses Philippians 2:10-13 and 2 Peter 3:9 to say because God wills for all to be saved, at some point, all will be saved.[10]
                It can be argued that a judge is not fair or just if he sends someone to jail, regardless of their crime. If the judge were to release a guilty person, the outcry would be tremendous. When a person commits a crime, he knowingly accepts the risks and in essence, seals his own fate. The judge is simply the tool that makes it legal; so it is with God. He does not make us sin (Jas. 1:13), but when we do, He gives us a way out. (John 3:16). Our sins must be punished and for those who accept the atonement of Christ, we can escape damnation; this is neither unjust nor un-loving.
        When sharing the gospel with others, the truth is always best. The lost need to know what they are facing and we must present them with their options, much like a doctor informing his patient that has cancer. To do any less is not love.


Bibliography
Elwell, Walter A. Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Edition. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House Company, 2001.

Pinnock, C. H. "The Destruction of the Finally Impenitent," Criswell Theological Review 4 (Spring 1990): 246 - 7.


        [1].  C. H. Pinnock, "The Destruction of the Finally Impenitent," Criswell Theological Review 4 (Spring 1990): 246 - 7.
      
        [2].  Ibid., 246 - 7.

       [3]. Walter A. Elwell, Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Edition, (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House Company, 2001), 64.

        [4]. Ibid., 1232-3.
        [5].  Walter A. Elwell, Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Edition, (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House Company, 2001), 64.

        [6]. Ibid., 1098; 532. 

        [7]. Ibid. 480.
 
        [8]. Ibid., 548.
         9. Walter A. Elwell, Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Edition, (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House Company, 2001), 547.

        [10]. Ibid., 1232.

No comments:

Post a Comment