Saturday, January 19, 2013

Destiny of the Unsaved



        There are many arguments used today to try to disprove God’s existence. One such argument is that a loving God would not send people to Hell. Clark Pinnock writes, "How can Christians possibly project a deity of such cruelty and vindictiveness whose ways include inflicting everlasting torture upon His creatures, however sinful they may have been? Surely a God who would do such a thing is more nearly like Satan than like God, at least by any ordinary moral standards, and by the gospel itself."[1]     
        To state, “at least by any ordinary moral standards, and by the gospel itself," one acknowledges a moral standard or law.[2] If there is a moral law, there must be a moral law giver. This moral lawgiver is the God of the Bible. Pinnock states that He is cruel and no better than Satan; however, for a person to form an educated opinion, they must look at the facts. The Bible does say anyone who rejects Jesus Christ in this life will spend eternity in judgment but depending on a person’s beliefs, that judgment may look very different.
        Two approaches to reconcile sinners with God’s judgment, while eliminating eternal damnation, are annihilationism and universalism. Annihilationism says the souls of the lost either become non-existent at death or eventually lapse into nothingness.[3] Universalism says all souls are eventually saved.[4] These views, while using specific verses in an attempt to gain credibility, clearly contradict the teachings of the apostle John and Jesus Himself in regards to future punishment. Interestingly, both spoke more about the love of God than any other contributors to the New Testament.[5] Eternal punishment is exactly that, eternal (Mat. 18:8; 25:41, 46; 2 Thes. 1:9). There is some dispute as to the degree and specifics of the punishment but the Scriptures clearly support this idea.
          The Bible uses different words that have similar meaning in regards to the place of punishment. Sheol, according to the Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, is an intermediate state where the soul is dealt with and Hades, “is virtually synonymous with the Hebrew Sheol.”[6] Another word found in the Scriptures is Gehenna and it is used metaphorically for hell; originally a location outside the city of Jerusalem, people would sacrifice their children to Moloch and burn their bodies there.[7] The word Hell is used in various locations throughout Scripture and has various meanings, the original meaning, “simply ‘the grave.’”[8]
        The idea of fire and brimstone conjure up images of tormented souls in a fiery, cavernous dwelling. The Biblical story of Lazarus and the rich man give a glimpse into the states of eternal life or damnation (Lk. 16:19-31). The thought of the rich man begging for a drop of water on his tongue and not wanting his brothers to perish with him is almost unbearable. Most likely, this is where many opponents to Christianity find God to be tyrannical and unjust.
        Jesus said it would be better to pluck out your own eye and live than to save it and go to hell (Mat. 5:29). That is a shocking statement but if He used such a graphic example, obviously it is worse than we can imagine. In Matthew 25:46, Jesus plainly states that we will either go to eternal punishment or eternal life. John wrote, “Anyone whose name was not found written in the book of life was thrown into the lake of fire” (Rev. 20:15, NIV).
        One argument against the existence of hell is stated, “Truth, we are told, is discovered only by science and since hell can’t be proven by the scientific method it must be rejected.”[9] Another argument against hell and eternal damnation is the doctrine of apokatastasis. It uses Philippians 2:10-13 and 2 Peter 3:9 to say because God wills for all to be saved, at some point, all will be saved.[10]
                It can be argued that a judge is not fair or just if he sends someone to jail, regardless of their crime. If the judge were to release a guilty person, the outcry would be tremendous. When a person commits a crime, he knowingly accepts the risks and in essence, seals his own fate. The judge is simply the tool that makes it legal; so it is with God. He does not make us sin (Jas. 1:13), but when we do, He gives us a way out. (John 3:16). Our sins must be punished and for those who accept the atonement of Christ, we can escape damnation; this is neither unjust nor un-loving.
        When sharing the gospel with others, the truth is always best. The lost need to know what they are facing and we must present them with their options, much like a doctor informing his patient that has cancer. To do any less is not love.


Bibliography
Elwell, Walter A. Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Edition. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House Company, 2001.

Pinnock, C. H. "The Destruction of the Finally Impenitent," Criswell Theological Review 4 (Spring 1990): 246 - 7.


        [1].  C. H. Pinnock, "The Destruction of the Finally Impenitent," Criswell Theological Review 4 (Spring 1990): 246 - 7.
      
        [2].  Ibid., 246 - 7.

       [3]. Walter A. Elwell, Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Edition, (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House Company, 2001), 64.

        [4]. Ibid., 1232-3.
        [5].  Walter A. Elwell, Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Edition, (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House Company, 2001), 64.

        [6]. Ibid., 1098; 532. 

        [7]. Ibid. 480.
 
        [8]. Ibid., 548.
         9. Walter A. Elwell, Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Edition, (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House Company, 2001), 547.

        [10]. Ibid., 1232.

The Problem of Evil



        Murder, rape and other violent crimes, as well as hurricanes and other natural disasters, are more frequent today than in the near past. This being the case, many people are asking, if God is all loving and all powerful, why does He allow evil to exist? To address this issue, since it is directed at God, the most logical place to look is with God Himself. He speaks to man through His word, the Bible. 
        The first step would be to look at the problem of evil. In the Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, it states, “There is no one problem, because there are various kinds of problems of evil, and all are different.”[1] It goes on to say that, from a theological standpoint, known as a theodicy, the view, in question, must not contradict itself; not that it cannot contradict the questioner’s views or the beliefs of another theistic system.[2] Therefore, the questioner has to weigh the theodicy and then evaluate whether there is any contradiction.
        The Bible says that God created everything that was created, including man and He made man in His image (Gen. 1:27; Gen. 5:1; Deut. 4:32; Eph. 4:24, NKJV). He gave man an inherent knowledge of right and wrong and he gave this man, Adam, one command, “Of every tree of the garden you may freely eat; but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die.” (Gen. 2:16-17, NKJV). Adam had a personal relationship with God; yet he disobeyed Him. This is where the first problem of evil begins (for mankind).
        According to the Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, there are two types of evil: moral and natural.[3] However, while different, you cannot separate them. Moral evil is the act whereby man breaks God’s law; while natural evil, hurricanes, etc., are a result of man’s sinfulness.[4] When Adam chose to willfully disobey God, he brought God’s curse, not only upon mankind but on the earth itself. God created perfection; man invited sin and corruption.
        There are various theodicies; one is that of Gottfried Leibniz. His theodicy is based on metaphysics. He states that God, if He indeed is good, would have to put man in the absolute best environment and under the best conditions for him to thrive.[5] He also reasons that “God always operates on the basis of sufficient reason.”[6] Summed up, if man can best thrive in a world that contains both moral good and moral evil, God would have to provide this environment for Him (God) to be just and good. While Leibniz does not contradict himself, the questioner may not agree with him. 
        Other theodicies, “rest upon a modified rationalistic theology.”[7] Basic points of these theodicies are: (1) God is not under obligation to create any world because His existence is the supreme good; (2) creating a world is a good thing but not the only good thing He could do and whatever He does is based on reason but these reasons are not necessarily universal law; (3) there are a limitless number of worlds He could create but some are inherently evil by nature, therefore He could not create them but there are other good worlds He could create. There is no such thing as a best possible world. (4) Lastly, God had the choice to create or not, as He so chose.[8]  
        According to the Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, the problem of evil arises in this theodicy. One such problem is whether this world is one of the good worlds; another problem is the sinful acts carried out by creatures that God created for this world, supposing that God created a world where evil did not exist.[9]    
        A theodicy, to have merit, must be internally consistent. It must show that God is good, while not removing evil from the world. As an act of perfect love, God gave man the free will to choose or reject Him. Anything less and man would not have the freedom to choose and that would not be perfect love. As a further act of perfect love, God prepared a plan of redemption for fallen man, the perfect sacrifice of Jesus on the cross. God gave man the option to choose but provides a way back into fellowship with Him for eternity (John 1:1-14; Acts 3:13-26).
        Sin separates man from God and an unrepentant man cannot be in fellowship with God because God is holy. He must first repent and confess his sin; then God will hear him and abide with him and give him eternal life. A believer may have questions for or about God, Job and his friends did. Although they all disputed certain beliefs about God, He showed His great mercy and forgave them. (Job 2:11-42:17). The believer is expected to pray and study God’s word; if he does, God will reveal His truths to that person; however, if a person chooses to believe a thing based on convenience or selfish motivation, God will deal with him.   
         




Bibliography
Elwell, Walter A. Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Edition. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House Company, 2001.



What is the problem of evil?
Define moral evil and natural evil, and illustrate them with examples.
Seek to explain why there is sin among mankind (the philosophical problem of moral evil) and why bad things happen in nature (the philosophical problem of natural evil). Consider the various theodicies presented in the reading, and address the merits and faults of each one.
Briefly explain why a theodicy must be internally consistent, and defend the internal consistency of your explanation of evil’s existence.
Consider how personal experience of evil may affect one’s relationship with God (the religious problem of evil).  Do you believe someone can dispute a certain belief about God without actually attacking God Himself?


        [1].  Walter A. Elwell, Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Edition, (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House Company, 2001), 414.

        [2]. Ibid., 414.
        [3]. Walter A. Elwell, Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Edition, (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House Company, 2001), 412.

        [4]. Ibid., 412

        [5]. Ibid., 1185.

        [6]. Ibid., 1185.

        [7]. Ibid., 1185.
      
        [8]. Ibid., 1185.

        [9]. Ibid., 1185.

Saturday, October 27, 2012

“Johnny, My Beloved Son”




Some time ago, I wrote about my brother Johnny who had Down Syndrome. This week, Joni Ericson Tada aired his story on her program, “Joni and Friends.” For those who don’t realize the atrocities done to the less fortunate or unwanted, this will open your eyes. While this occurrence took place in the 1940’s, things haven’t changed much, with the exception that thousands of children are being aborted because it is possible they have some type of disorder, based on test that were not available back then.  

You can listen by clicking on the following link:


Click on, “Johnny, My Beloved Son”


Many Americans are asking “where is GOD?” We kicked Him out of our schools, our court rooms, our government institutions and we kill our children (among other things).
Every child is of value, and as King David said,

For You formed my inward parts; You covered me in my mother’s womb.
I will praise You, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made; marvelous are Your works, and that my soul knows very well. My frame was not hidden from You, When I was made in secret, and skillfully wrought in the lowest parts of the earth. Your eyes saw my substance, being yet unformed. And in Your book they all were written, the days fashioned for me, when as yet there were none of them. How precious also are Your thoughts to me, O God! How great is the sum of them! If I should count them, they would be more in number than the sand; when I awake, I am still with You. 
                                                                                               –Psalm 139:13-18, NKJV 

Our children are precious unto the Lord. If you are considering an abortion or placing your child in an institution, please prayerfully reconsider. If you have already done so and you are living with the pain of regret, it’s not too late. Cry out to God and He will hear you and receive you. He will forgive your sins and heal your broken heart. All of us need to support the rights of the mentally and physically challenged, as well as all unborn babies.

God bless~