Saturday, July 11, 2015

Redefining the Family



Family dynamics vary slightly in appearance from one culture to another but the basic family unit has traditionally consisted of a father, mother, and children. In time past, the father was generally responsible for the education and spiritual development of his family. In recent years, the role of the father has typically been viewed as the provider and protector while the mother has managed the home, to include the primary care of the children. Currently, there is an effort to redefine the family in modern society. This paper will explore a redefining of the family, primarily where the father’s role is diminished or he is absent and how that affects the children and society in general.       
For the Christian, family is more than a social construct. The Bible contains not only God’s instructions for the individual’s life but also includes His familial order and the boundaries. God is social by nature and He created man in His image; therefore man is social (Gen. 1:27). The book of Genesis records the creation of the universe, including man. He did this in six progressive, twenty-four hour days and at the conclusion of each creative day, He stated that His creation was good. The first mention of something that was not good was for the man to be alone; thus, God created woman (Gen. 2:18). After God made a suitable mate for the man, He commanded them to “be fruitful and multiply” (Gen. 1:28). This was His plan for populating the earth and set a precedent for the family. Until recently, this plan has been followed, even within communities that have never heard of the God of the Bible. It appears that there is an inherent knowledge of the natural order of things. When the natural order is corrupted, the system begins to fall apart. 
Divorce can wreak havoc on families and children in particular. According to Richard Behrman and Linda Quinn, there is, “related and crucial concern about the effects of divorce on children's emotional and psychological well-being, and on their successful development and transition to adulthood.”[1] They do note that not all children respond alike and much of the healing or transition can be affected by the way, in which the parents handle the divorce. They write, “Variables that are believed to account for children's adjustment to divorce include the amount and nature of involvement of the noncustodial parent, the custodial parent's adjustment to divorce and his or her parenting skills, interparental conflict before and after divorce, economic hardship, and other life stresses (for example, moving, changing schools, parental remarriage).”[2]
The absence of the father in the home is a major blow to the spiritual health of the family and Satan knows this. If he can remove the father, his job of destroying the lives of the children is almost complete. There are various reasons why the father may not be in the home. Death, divorce, and mothers choosing to parent alone are a few examples.
Many judges and court officials have taken a biased approach and typically award custody of children to the mother simply because they feel the mother is best suited to care for the children, even in cases where the mother has a less than stellar or stable history. Numerous studies have shown a clearly biased opinion towards fathers but according to some experts, this may be changing. Few would probably argue that a child, especially a very young child, needs its mother but many argue that the father is un-necessary to the welfare of the child.
Dennis Vatsis sees this as a problem and, in his article Throwaway, based on his book Throwaway Dads, claims that fathers are at a severe disadvantage in court cases deciding custody issues and writes, “There is a societal and cultural dynamic for the gender discrimination experienced by fathers within the domestic relations arena.[3] According to research included in the article (by a special task force commissioned by the Michigan Supreme Court), judges typically made their decision to grant custody to the mother based on the ‘tender years doctrine’ which supposed that the mother could best meet the needs of the child, especially younger children. This was largely due to the time when the father began working away from the home and the mother typically stayed at home. As Vatsis points out, today’s culture sees women just as active working outside of the home but this old way of thinking by the court still persists.[4] 
Vatsis argues that a child deserves the benefit of having access to both parents. Unless one parent is proven a threat to the welfare of the child, he advocates joint custody but as he points out, too many judges disagree. In his closing remarks, he states:

The United States and Michigan constitutions each provide that no one shall be deprived of the equal protection of the law. The Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution explicitly provides that no state shall deprive a person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, or deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law. Yet fathers in Michigan are being denied equal protection and due process and are being deprived of custodial rights to their children. Equal justice under the law is an illusory legal concept in the domestic relations arena. This gender bias against fathers has to be addressed for the benefit of not only the disenfranchised father, but principally for the children who deserve to have not one, but both parents actively involved in parenting.[5]
 
Michigan is not the only state to fall short in its war against fatherhood. Unfortunately, the idea that the father is not important in the life of his child seems to be the trend in many states.
            Surprisingly, some feminist groups have joined father’s rights groups to denounce this bias against fathers but they say it goes beyond bias against fathers. Cynthia McNeely writes that the courts largely view the father and mother in a stereotypical way, fathers as unnecessary and mothers as weak and dependant on a man to support them. She also blames the court for undermining the family when she writes, “This state-instituted romantic paternalization of mothers, combined with the narrowed view of the role of fathers, is largely responsible for the wholesale destruction of the post-divorce, father-child relationship.[6] She continues, “Consequently, the state creates increased psychological, educational, behavioral, and health disorders for children, and crime and violence for society.”[7]   
The Bible is not silent on the role or importance of the father. In Deuteronomy, fathers are instructed to teach their children about the Lord and remind them of what He had done for them (Deut. 4:9,10. 6:4-9). Solomon, considered by many biblical scholars to be the wisest man to ever live, sought to instruct his son when he wrote the book of Proverbs (Prov. 1:8,9). The father is to be the spiritual leader of the home and, according to Randy Stinson and Timothy Jones, “The father was the key to the family, and a son was a future leader.”[8]
Stinson and Jones explain the correlation of the trinity and compare them to the roles within the family. They point out the headship of the Father and the submissive roles of the Son and the Holy Spirit. The Son submits to the Father and the Holy Spirit submits to the Father and the Son, yet each share in equality. The roles of the family are similar in that the wife is to submit to her husband and the children are to submit to their father and mother.[9] Stinson and Jones also point out that the father has a unique role as the spiritual leader and write, “Husbands and fathers bear responsibility for the Christian nurture of their households-a responsibility that differs from that of their wives and from other members of the household.”[10]
Kenda Creasy Dean, an Associate Professor of Youth, Church, and Culture at Princeton Theological Seminary, played a key role in The National Study of Youth and Religion that sought to find answers to why young people appear to be apathetic to church and faith in general. While the study found common problems related to youth programs, the church in general, believability of the Scriptures, etc., the main reason identified was the lack of faith demonstrated in the home. The respondents simply adopted the belief and faith practices of their parents. She states, “We must assume that the solution lies not in beefing up congregational youth programs or making worship more ‘cool’ and attractive, but in modeling the kind of mature, passionate faith we say we want young people to have.”[11]
In another study, conducted by Ken Ham and Brit Beemer, their results were similar. While many parents and churches blame the universities for leading their children astray, these survey results drew a different conclusion. The majority of those youths who attended church prior to college and never came back were slowly slipping away before they graduated from high school, ninety percent of them. Between junior high and high school, these kids were already gone.[12]
In a postmodern culture, sex outside of marriage is accepted, even applauded. Sex dominates television and the movies; it is even used by advertisers to sell cars and hamburgers. American public schools teach “sex education” and “safety” rather than abstinence, even unsafe and unhealthy practices. Numerous unmarried young women become pregnant through one nightstands or casual sexual encounters and have no desire to seek a relationship with the child’s father. Some opt to abort while others choose to become a single parent. Many feminists promote the idea that men are merely sperm donors and are not necessary for child rearing but ironically, they fight for the rights of two men to adopt children claiming that they can provide an equally loving and nurturing environment as a single mother or two mothers.
There has not been a great deal of study to support or deny this claim but at least one study has shown that this is not the case. Dr. Mark Regnerus, a sociologist at the University of Texas in Austin, conducted a study that provided substantial proof that contradicts this notion. His study concluded that children raised in a home with homosexual parents fared worse than those children raised in homes with heterosexual parents; even worse than homes where divorce had occurred.[13]   
With the problem of fatherless children and fathers who are content to entrust there sacred responsibility of teaching their children to others, most churches, especially those in the inner city, have adopted programs in the church to meet the growing need for spiritual training. Unfortunately, “in many cases, churches are focusing on family ministry as a reaction to dismal retention statistics.[14]
The Christian family, comprised of a father, mother, and child/children, is the best model for: (1) carrying out God’s plan for populating the earth, (2) producing Godly offspring, and (3) maintaining a Godly society. However, it must be noted that even during Israel’s years of wandering through the desert, the people strayed despite the leadership of Moses and a strict adherence to the law. No plan, no amount of laws, or the enforcement of such can guarantee a Godly society but it can produce the most conducive environment for it.        
The Bible says that a man is to leave his family and join himself to his wife so that they become one flesh (Gen. 2:24; Mat. 19:5). Sadly, many today want all of the benefits of marriage and may sincerely believe that they are in love, only to abandon the relationship when times become difficult. When considering the practical application of this verse, there is clinical proof to support staying together may be the better choice:  

In a study released in 2002, Waite and five colleagues analyzed data from the University of Wisconsin’s National Survey of Family and Households. They discovered that adults who said they were unhappily married in the late 1980’s and got divorced were on average still unhappy or even less happy when interviewed five years later as compared to those who stayed in their marriages. Most of those who stayed in their marriages had on average moved past the bad times and reached a happier stage. After controlling for race, age, gender, and income, the researchers found that divorce usually did not reduce symptoms of depression, raise self-esteem, or increase a sense of mastery over one’s life. The general conclusion is that divorce does not make unhappy married people any happier. Therefore, people who stay in an unhappy marriage are at least as well off as those who divorce.[15]

While many argue for nontraditional-family lifestyles, the evidence is clear. A home where a father and mother love one another and commit to one another is the most suitable environment for raising happy, healthy children. Both Christian and secular studies show this to be the case. Those who truly love children should put the best interests of the child above their own desires to have a family if they live outside the boundaries that are most conducive to healthy child rearing.
Without absolute truth, of which the Bible clearly advocates, modern society is easily led into believing that there is no standard or absolute moral code for behavior. This attitude of postmodern thought suggests that individual choice trumps any other type of behavior including God's design for marriage. This mentality suggest that people can do what they want, make of life what they will, and break all the rules without any thought to the consequences of their actions. The problem with this mentality is that when people do whatever they want, someone else has to pay.
When adults adopt lifestyles that veer outside of biblical and conventional wisdom, it creates an unhealthy environment for not only the adults but the children as well. Satan seeks to destroy the family. When the family is redefined, Satan wins. Thus, divorce as well as cohabitation; homosexua1 marriage or other modern definitions of marriage destroy the very foundation of Biblical marriage and family. Children that are raised in any environment outside of the God-ordained family unit, which includes the husband and wife model, will suffer to some degree. Furthermore, as spiritual leader, provider, and protector, the father plays a vital role to the psychological, spiritual, and physical health of the family. When you remove the father from his God-given role, the family stands unguarded, and is open to Satan’s attack. The result is evidenced clearly; broken families make broken societies. 






Bibliography
Balswick, Jack O. and Judith K. Balswick. The Family: A Christian Perspective on the Contemporary Home. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 3rd ed. 2007.

Behrman, Richard E., and Linda S. Quinn. "Children and Divorce: Overview and Analysis." The Future of Children: 4, no. 1 (1994). Accessed May 5, 2015. http://futureofchildren.org/publications/journals/article/index.xml?journalid=63&articleid=407§ionid=2773.

Carey, Benedict. "Debate on a Study Examining Gay Parents." The New York Times. Accessed April 19, 2015. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/12/health/study-examines-effect-of-having-a-gay-parent.html?_r=0.

Dean, Kenda Creasy. Almost Christian: What The Faith Of Our Teenagers Is Telling The American Church. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Ham, Ken, Britt Beemer, and Todd Hillard. Already Gone: Why Your Kids Will Quit Church and What You Can Do To Stop It. Green Forest, AR: Master Books, 2009.

McNeely, Cynthia A. "Lagging Behind the Times: Parenthood, Custody, and Gender Bias in the Family Court." Florida State Law Review 25 (n.d.): 891-956. http://archive.law.fsu.edu/journals/lawreview/downloads/254/mcneely.pdf.

Stinson, Randy, and Timothy P. Jones, eds. Trained in the Fear of God: Family Ministry in Theological, Historical, and Practical Perspective. Grand Rapids: Kregel Publications, 2011.

Vatsis, Dennis G. "Throwaway Dads [article]." Michigan Bar Journal no. 9 (2001): 54. HeinOnline,     EBSCOhost (accessed May 2, 2015).
 


[1]. Richard E. Behrman and Linda S. Quinn, "Children and Divorce: Overview and Analysis," The Future of Children: 4, no. 1 (1994), Accessed April 4, 2015, http://futureofchildren.org/publications/ 
journals/article/index.xml?journalid=63&articleid=407§ionid=2773. 

[2]. Ibid.
 
[3]. Dennis G. Vatsis, "Throwaway Dads [article]," Michigan Bar Journal no. 9 (2001): 54, HeinOnline, EBSCOhost  (accessed May 2, 2015) 56.

[4]. Ibid., 56

[5]. Ibid. 58.

[6]. Cynthia A. McNeeley, "Lagging Behind the Times: Parenthood, Custody, and Gender Bias in the Family Court," Florida State Law Review 25 (n.d.): 891-956, http://archive.law.fsu.edu/journals/lawreview/downloads/254/mcneely.pdf.,

[7]. Ibid.

[8]. Randy Stinson, and Timothy P. Jones, eds., Trained in the Fear of God: Family Ministry in Theological, Historical, and Practical Perspective, (Grand Rapids: Kregel Publications, 2011) 38. 

[9].  Ibid., 68.                       

[10]. Ibid., 68.

[11]. Kenda Creasy Dean, Almost Christian: What The Faith Of Our Teenagers Is Telling The American Church, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010) 3,4.

[12]. Ken Ham, Britt Beemer, and Todd Hillard, Already Gone: Why Your Kids Will Quit Church and What You Can Do To Stop It, (Green Forest, AR: Master Books, 2009) 31-2. 

[13]. Benedict Carey, "Debate on a Study Examining Gay Parents," The New York Times, Accessed April 19, 2015, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/12/health/study-examines-effect-of-having-a-gay-parent.html?_r=0.

[14]. Randy Stinson, and Timothy P. Jones, eds., 18.  

[15].  Jack O. Balswick, and Judith K. Balswick, The Family: A Christian Perspective on the Contemporary Home, (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 3rd ed., 2007) 299.

No comments:

Post a Comment